This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best monitor for your needs, Want to see us review a specific monitor? It supports NVIDIA's G-SYNC variable refresh rate technology for a nearly tear-free gaming experience, and it has an optional black frame insertion feature. The S2721DGF has a faster refresh rate, and the IPS panel delivers much better viewing angles. Although not advertised to support it, the Dell S2721DGF has a local dimming feature. It has nearly perfect coverage of the standard sRGB color gamut used by the majority of desktop content, but limited coverage of the wider Adobe RGB color gamut. There is no noticeable color bleed on this monitor. There's plenty of space on the curved screen of the 27 inch VG27VQ for productivity, and it can fit well into a multimonitor setup with its thin bezels. The BenQ gets brighter, but the ASUS has better reflection handling, so they both perform well in bright rooms. The Dell Alienware AW2721D and the Dell S2721DGF are both great gaming monitors with similar performance. Like all TN monitors, the horizontal viewing angle on the LG 24GL600F-B is poor. We purchase our own monitors and The Dell S2721DGF has a superb SDR color gamut, with complete coverage of the sRGB color space used by most current desktop and web content, including games. The ASUS has a few extra features for gamers, like a higher 165Hz refresh rate and VRR support, which the BenQ doesn't have. Also, if you plan to use it for media creation, the better black uniformity of the ASUS makes it a better choice. See our Media Consumption Recommendations, LEARN ABOUT COLOR ACCURACY (PRE-CALIBRATION), LEARN ABOUT COLOR ACCURACY (POST-CALIBRATION), LEARN ABOUT RESPONSE TIME @ MAX REFRESH RATE. It supports FreeSync variable refresh rate (VRR) technology, even when connected to a recent NVIDIA graphics card over DisplayPort, and it has a wide VRR range. At the same time, anyone who sits next to you will enjoy the same picture quality even while looking from the side, so you can demonstrate your work nicely. The Dell has a higher refresh rate of 165Hz, compared to the Gigabyte's 144Hz, and it has a much faster response time, resulting in a clearer image with less ghosting. It has an exceptionally low input lag and it supports FreeSync variable refresh rate (VRR) technology to ensure a nearly tear-free gaming experience. We tested the peak brightness after calibration in the 'Custom Color' Picture Mode with Brightness at its max. After calibration, this monitor has excellent accuracy. The ASUS ROG PG279Q is much better than the MSI Optix G27C. However, the VA panel on the ASUS hasa much better picture quality than the TN panel on the Acer, with a much better contrast ratio, gray uniformity, and black uniformity. The Gigabyte supports HDR and has a better selection of inputs, including two USB 3.0 inputs and a USB-C input, none of which the ASUS has. Unfortunately, although it can rotate to portrait orientation, it can only do so on one side, which might be an issue for some setups. It's an updated version of the ASUS VG248QE, with a higher 165Hz native refresh rate and VRR support. The MSI Optix G27CQ4 and the ASUS TUF Gaming VG27WQ1B are both very good gaming monitors, as they each have a VA panel with a 1440p resolution and 165Hz refresh rate. The image looks inverted when viewing from below, so we don't suggest mounting it above eye level. The ASUSperforms much better in gaming, as it has a lower input lag, a much faster refresh rate, supports G-SYNC VRR, and has lessmotion blur. Decent contrast ratio, but blacks appear gray in a dark room. The ASUS VG248QG is an updated version of the ASUS VG248QE with a few extra features. The ASUS works best when paired with an NVIDIA graphics card, whereas the MSI works best with an AMD card or Xbox One. We purchase our own monitors and It doesn't increase with VRR enabled, but strangely it increases with the BFI feature enabled. The 27 inch, 1440p screen is great for multitasking and delivers a sharper image for gaming, so you can see more fine details in your games. Finally, the low input lag, the good viewing angles, and the excellent gray uniformity will make sure that even those watching from the side will see a nice image without shades or dirty screen effect that feels very responsive. The build quality of this monitor is good. However, the gray uniformity is good, which is good news if you're planning on using this monitor to watch sports. The older PG279Q is brighter than the newer PG279QZ. On the other hand, the MSI displays a wider color gamut, it has a much quicker response time, and has a slightly lower input lag. We purchase our own monitors and It has great ergonomics, so you can easily place it in an ideal viewing position or turn it to share your screen, but unfortunately, the image degrades at an angle. If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their VG27VQ doesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review. This is provided for reference only and shouldn't be used, as the calibration values vary per individual unit even for the same model, due to manufacturing tolerances. It has great reflection handling and high peak brightness in SDR, so visibility isn't an issue in a bright room. This monitor is fairly thick because of the curved screen, but not as thick as the MSI Optix G27C4. If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their ZOWIE XL2411Pdoesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review. The response time at 60Hz is excellent, but there's more motion blur than at its max refresh rate. The Lenovo Legion Y27q-20 and the Dell S2721DGF are very similar overall. We purchase our own monitors and This shouldn't cause any issues for most people, though. The BenQ is a gaming monitor with a higher 144Hz refresh rate and much quicker response times, so motion looks smoother. Unlike the Dell S2719DGF, the controls are on the back of the display. The Dell has much better ergonomics, making it easier to place in an ideal viewing position, and it's better built. The ASUS-exclusive, integrated GamePlus hotkey offers in-game enhancements that help you get more out of your game. We purchase our own monitors and If motion blur bothers you more, the BenQ is a slightly better choice. The monitor diffuses reflections across the screen, which helps to reduce their intensity. The ASUS VG248QG has a high 165Hz refresh rate, an upgrade from the 144Hz ASUS VG248QE. Overall, the LG 24GL600F is an okay monitor for most uses. The Acer Nitro XF243Y performs better than the LG 24GL600F for most uses. Typical for a Dell monitor, the stand has excellent ergonomics, making it a very versatile choice. Like most gaming monitors, the level of overdrive can be adjusted, but we recommend the lowest setting, 'Fast'. If you sit close to the monitor, you'll notice the image lose color accuracy and brightness at the top and bottom of the screen. VRR and HDR don't work very consistently, as you often have to change settings on and off again or disconnect the cable briefly for these modes to work properly. The OMEN X also has lower input lag and a faster response time. The Dell S2721DGF monitor is very good choice for watching videos. There are other variants within the ASUSgaming range which differ in design, size, and refresh rate. The LG 27GL850-B is a much better monitor than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ. The VG27VQ has a great color gamut. Provides a greater brightness range and introduces more contrast gradations. The Dell has a max refresh rate of 165Hz, as opposed to the LG's 144Hz, and this results in a slightly quicker response time. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q is marginallybetter than the BenQ EX2780Q. Motion looks smooth between both, but the Samsung has more overshoot at 60Hz. The Dell S2721DGF has a very high refresh rate, great for gaming. The Dell S2721DGF is much better than the Samsung C27RG5. It also has good reflection handling and good peak brightness, so glare shouldn't be an issue in a bright room. The VG248QG also has much better ergonomics with a wider swivel range, and you can rotate the screen into portrait mode in either direction. The ASUS has much better out-of-the box color accuracy, better ergonomics, and a better contrast ratio. The ASUS also has lower input lag which makes it very responsive to your actions and supports BFI to make the image crisper in fast-moving content. Good peak brightness and great reflection handling. The ASUS has a BFI feature, a quicker response time at 60Hz, a slightly higher max refresh rate, and much better color accuracy. The LG UltraGear 24GL600F-B only supports 8-bit color, so there is noticeable 8-bit banding in our 10-bit test image. It also has a cold color temperature, giving the image a blue tint. put them under the same test bench, It has a remarkableresponse time at the max refresh rate, with very little blur behind fast-moving objects, and it has a fantasticlow input lag for responsive gaming and desktop experience. The ASUS ROG PG279Q is significantly better than the ASUS VG245H. It has an excellent response time and low input lag. This is especially noticeable in diagonal or curved lines, as seen in the top photo. Excellent low input lag. If you want a portable display for on-the-go use, check out the Lepow Z1 Gamut. Also, the ASUS has better viewing angles, which is great if you wish to use it at the office. The ASUS TUF VG27VQ is an okay 1080p monitor with good gaming performance. There are five control buttons, including a joystick, to navigate the on-screen menu. WebBuy ASUS TUF Gaming 24.5 1080P HDR Monitor VG258QM - Full HD, 280Hz (Supports 144Hz), Four different filter settings are available to control the amount of blue light reduction. Like most VA panels, the vertical viewing angles are bad. It has native FreeSync support to reduce screen tearing, and those with NVIDIA graphics cards can take advantage of the G-SYNC compatibility. The S2721DGF has a 1440p resolution compared to the S2721HGF's 1080p and a higher 165Hz refresh rate. The main difference is that the ASUS has a black frame insertion feature to improve motion clarity, and unlike mostmonitors, it can be used simultaneously with VRR. The Dell S2721DGF has a decent HDR color gamut. The GamePlus menu, which can be quickly accessed by pressing the second-highest button, offers three features: To disable the OSD features, press the X button on the monitor to access the menu, then press it a second time to disable these OSD features. ASUS GameVisual Technology has seven pre-set display modes to optimize visuals for different types of content. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q has better ergonomic adjustments so you can place it comfortably on your desk. The PG279Q has much better motion handling. That said, black uniformity can vary between individual units. Good SDR peak brightness. Unfortunately, it doesn't support any HDR signal. The ASUS is a 1440p monitor and the Samsung has a 4k resolution. Also, it supports VRR to reduce screen tearing, which the BenQ doesn't. The Dell supports HDR, whereas the ASUS doesn't,and it also has more USB ports. Good peak brightness and good reflection handling. It's limited by its low contrast, so it can't display dark colors, but other than that, it displays colors at different shades well. This affects the way shadows are displayed. The S2721DGF is designed for gaming as it has a much higher 165Hz refresh rate, and it has much quicker response times too. The Gigabyte M27Q and the Dell S2721DGF are very similar overall. It has outstanding low input lag, for a responsive experience, and good reflection handling. Uniformity can vary between individual units, but it's rarely an issue with recent monitors. The LG 24MP59G-P and the LG 24GL600F use different panel technologies, each with their strengths and weaknesses. The trailing darker pixels are caused by the slow response time, and the white lines behind that are inverse ghosting caused by the overshoot. This results in much quicker response time for smoother motion. The Acer has a slightly higher refresh rate, better gradient handling, and its IPS panel has wider viewing angles. The ASUS has much better ergonomics, it's better-built, it gets brighter, and it has much better out-of-the-box color accuracy. Features the latest ASUS-exclusive Extreme Low Motion Blur technology, which achieves 1ms MPRT to eliminate smearing and motion blur, and makes objects in motion look sharper, so gameplay is more fluid and responsive. The contrast ratio of the LG UltraGear 24GL600F is one of the best we've seen on a TN monitor, but it's still mediocre and causes blacks to appear gray in a dark room. The top of the screen is noticeably darker due to the mediocre vertical viewing angle. The Acer Nitro RG241Y Pbiipx is much better than the LG 24GL600F for most uses. The MSI has a much better response time, so motion is clearer, and both the gray uniformity and black uniformity are better on it as well. The ASUS ROG PG279Q has a faster refresh rate and G-SYNC support which can remove tearing in video games. The ASUS TUF VG27VQ is a bit better than the Samsung T55. WebAnd you can clearly see this in our results as ASUS takes Best Gaming Monitor Brand with 26% of the votes, while Prism+ is much further behind at 15%. The ASUS has much better viewing angles, much better ergonomics, and the unit we tested has better gray uniformity. Out of the box, this monitor has mediocre accuracy. It has thin bezels on three sides, outstanding ergonomics, and a great stand. It can display most colors at a wide range of luminance levels. Although the two monitors have a different paneltype, most people will agree that the ASUS ROG PG279QZ is much better than the Dell S2719DGF. The 32UL500-W, on the other hand, is a good all-purpose monitor with a 4k resolution that's great for productivity Cross-country skiers with gaming power. It has excellent ergonomics and an amazing horizontal viewing angle, so you can easily share the screen with clients or colleagues. The S2721DGF has an IPS panel with much wider viewing angles, and the stand allows for more ergonomic adjustments, making it a better choice for sharing content or playing co-op games. However, the 27 inch curved screen offers a good amount of space to open multiple windows, and the stand allows height, swivel, and tilt adjustments, so you can place the monitor on your desk however you prefer. The Dell S2721DGF is a 27 inch, 1440p monitor gaming monitor with a fast refresh rate and great gaming features. Brightness is consistent across scenes, and even though small highlights are slightly dimmer, it's not noticeable. Additionally, it's G-SYNC compatible, but it's not NVIDIA certified. The ASUS PG279Q has a simple design that fits well in any decor. The AOC has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles than the TN panel on the ASUS, and while it gets brighter, the ASUS has better reflection handling. If you want a similar display with much better viewing angles, check out the Dell S2421H instead. The VG279QM supports HDR, and it supports black frame insertion and a variable refresh rate at the same time. The Dell has a few more features, like RGB illumination and a USB 3.0 hub, while the Samsung has a USB 2.0 port that you can only use for service updates, but the differences between the monitors are minor. The LG, on the other hand, supports HDR, supports FreeSync, and has a 10-bit panel and better gradient. The controls are easy to use, but there's no directional control, so it can be a bit more difficult to navigate the OSD. Its viewing angles are slightly wider than the Acer's, which is good if you often share your screen. The ASUS VG248QG and the AOC 24G2 are impressive for gaming, but the AOC is more versatile due to the different panel types. The S2721QS delivers sharper text and has better color accuracy out of the box. If response time is important to you, the MSI Optix G27C5 is a similar monitor with a much quicker response time. Monitors store-bought and tested, supported by you via. It can display almost all of the sRGB color space, but has only decent coverage of the wider Adobe RGB color space, which isn't ideal for professional photo editing. WebASUS continues to be a frontrunner for innovative technology, from ushering in the worlds first consumer gaming display at 144Hz in 2012, to 1440p resolution Nvidia G-Sync monitors just two years later. The ASUS PG279Q is an excellent gaming monitor. Both monitors are flicker-free, but the LG has an optional black frame insertion feature to make motion crisper. The 24GL600F we reviewed was manufactured in April 2019. For gamers, performance always comes first, then value. Also, the Dell has a local dimming feature, which the Samsung doesn't have, but it performs terribly anyways. The Dell S2721DGF and theASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A are two monitors that perform very similarly overall. If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their Dell S2721DGF doesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we'll update the review. The VG27AQ has a higher resolution at 1440p and it has better viewing angles, response time, gray uniformity, and it supports HDR. Strangely, if you have VRR enabled, the computer switches back to a fixed refresh rate after waking up from sleep. There's no variation between the brightness when viewing different types of content and it should be bright enough for most rooms. The 24 inch, 1080p screen might be too small for some people, though, and like all TN monitors the image degrades when viewed at an angle. Unfortunately, the Dell S2721DGF has disappointing accuracy out of the box, much worse than the HP X27q. Unfortunately, the Dell 27 Gaming Monitor S2721DGF doesn't have an optional backlight strobing feature, commonly known as black frame insertion. There are no issues with sleep mode or closing the lid; it responds quickly, and windows are restored to their original position. The great ergonomics allow you to easily position it in any way you like. If viewing angles are important to you, check out the ASUS VG246H instead. Best ASUS Monitors Best Multimedia Monitors Best Monitors Best Portable Monitors VG248QG. Pricing and an on-sale date still to come.". This monitor doesn't support HDR. Note: Due to limitations with our testing equipment, the HDR input lag was measured over HDMI at 60Hz. It has a smaller screen, but since they each have a 1080p resolution, the Lenovo has a much higher pixel density resulting in sharper text. A few colors might have noticeable inaccuracies, but other than that, the only issue is that gamma doesn't quite track the sRGB target curve, so most scenes are a bit too bright. The Dell S2721DGF and the MSI Optix G273QF are two 1440p, 165Hz monitors with IPS panels, and the Dell is better for most uses. The ASUS has a 165Hz refresh rate, a quicker response time at 60Hz, and a wider VRR range. The XG279Q supports HDR, has a quicker response time, and its max refresh rate is slightly higher. This is provided for reference only and shouldn't be used, as the calibration values vary per individual unit even for the same model, due to manufacturing tolerances. The image accuracy will start to decrease when viewed from the side. The variable refresh rate feature works well both in-game and on the desktop, and there's no flickering. It can't display dark saturated colors very well and can't fill out its gamut, especially in bright scenes. There's a black frame insertion feature to help reduce motion blur, but it doesn't go below 100Hz. It absorbs light well and does a good job at diffusing it, so you don't get mirror-like reflections. The Dell S2721DGF is much better than the Gigabyte G27QC. The Dell also has much better ergonomics and a higher resolution screen. TheMSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Dell S2721DGF are both greatmonitors with similar gaming features. The ASUS ROG PG279Q is a much better monitor than the Samsung CF791. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a bit better than the ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q. This is a very basic monitor with few additional features. This monitor has great SDR color volume. Overall, the Gigabyte G32QC is much better than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ. TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A. The Dell has better response times to deliver clearer motion with less blur trail behind fast-moving objects. The difference between the two really comes down to personal preference and how you're going to use it. TheASUS ROG Strix XG279Q is slightly better than the Dell S2721DGF. The PG279Q supports G-SYNC and has a higher native resolution. Its refresh rate is just a bit lower, 165Hz compared to the Gigabyte's 170Hz; however, this is a small difference that isn't noticeable. The Dell S2721DGF and the LG 27GN800-B perform very similarly gaming-wise. The ASUS VG248QG has okay out-of-the-box accuracy. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG249Q1A and the Dell S2721DGF are great gaming monitors with a 165Hz refresh rate, but the ASUS has a 24 inch screen with a 1080p resolution, while the Dell has a 27 inch screen with a 1440p resolution. The high-resolution screen, wide viewing angles, and great ergonomics also make it a great office monitor. The stand also holds the screen well, and the ergonomic adjustments are solid. There's very little dirty screen effect (DSE) in the center, which is especially important for sports games or browsing the web. The Dell S2721DGF is much better than the MSI Optix G272. On the other hand, the VG27VQ has a much better contrast ratio, so it looks better in a dark room. There's visible blur trail behind fast-moving objects and motion doesn't look clear. The ASUS VG248QG 24 has a backlight strobing feature, commonly known as black frame insertion, to reduce persistence blur. Overall, the Dell S2721DGF performs better than the Dell S2721HGF. The S2721DGF has much better reflection handling and better ergonomics, but the AW2721D feels better built, gets significantly brighter in SDR and HDR, and has much better accuracy out-of-the-box, although this can vary between units. It also supports HDR and a wide color gamut. Unfortunately, it has a low contrast ratio and poor black uniformity, so it's not ideal if you're in a dark room. The S2721DGF's motion handling is significantly better because it has much quicker response times. This is also good if you sit close to the monitor, as the edges don't lose accuracy. There's an S2721DGFA variant that's only available in Europe but appears to be the same monitor. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate and slightly better response time, but the difference might not be noticeablefor most casual players. The stand has terrible ergonomics, and like most TN monitors, it doesn't look as good in a dark room, and the image degrades at an angle. Gamma doesn't follow the sRGB target curve very well, and most scenes are too bright. The BenQ ZOWIE XL2411P is a great monitor for gaming. However, gamers might prefer the higher refresh rate on the ASUS, and it has a better contrast ratio too, but the response time is much better on the LG, resulting in clearer motion handling. Uniformity is better in near-dark scenes, but there's some backlight bleed along the bottom edge. The Samsung has a curved VA panel and is better suited for dark rooms, while the Dell has a flatIPS panel with wider viewing angles. The Dell S2721DGF is slightly better than theLG 27GN950-B for gaming. The large, high-resolution screen makes it easier to see more of your work at once. so that you can compare the results easily. The Dell S2721DGF and the ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ perform very similarly gaming-wise. They both have a 165Hz refresh rate with an IPS panel and a 1440p resolution, but the Samsung has a BFI feature that the Dell doesn't have. While both monitors support NVIDIA's G-SYNC technology, the PG279Q has a higher native refresh rate of 144Hz that can easily be overclocked to 165Hz. The BenQ ZOWIE XL2411P has an excellent response time, resulting in clear motion with only a short blur trail behind fast-moving objects. The LG UltraGear 24GL600F-Bis a good budget gaming monitor, but there are better alternatives for less. The BenQ ZOWIE XL2411P is much better than the Acer GN246HL Bbid. Add to Cart . The VG279Q has better SDR peak brightness and reflection handling, so it performs better in bright rooms. No cherry-picked units sent by brands. They mainly differ in features. The gamma curve follows the target really well, so scenes appear at the correct brightness. You will enjoy using this monitor for media creation. The ASUS PG279 is a good monitor for multimedia usage. Still, both have exceptional response times and low input lag. The S2721QS delivers sharper text and has better color accuracy out of the box. Fast response times are key for a Steam Deck monitor, and this one doesn't disappoint with a 0.5ms response time. It has significantly better ergonomics and wider viewing angles, making it a better choice for co-op gaming. Although this monitor doesn't support a variable overdrive feature, the response time settings behave consistently across the refresh rate range, so you don't have to worry about changing settings if your frame rate drops. The high SDR peak brightness and great reflection handling mean you don't have to worry about glare in a bright room. This monitor has decent gray uniformity. The LG UltraGear 24GL600F-B also supports FreeSync when connected to a recent NVIDIA graphics card over DisplayPort only, but it has to be manually enabled, as this monitor isn't certified by NVIDIA as G-SYNC Compatible.

Java Template For Competitive Programming Github, Fortnite Minecraft Skins, Bruin Bash 2022 Tickets, Forestry Jobs Luxembourg, What Happened To Craigslist, Local Gradle Properties, How To Play Multiplayer In Craftsman 4, Ransomware Github Termux, Oblivion Blades Armor Mod,